prase comments on The Effectiveness of Developing World Aid - Less Wrong

19 Post author: multifoliaterose 12 September 2010 09:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: prase 13 September 2010 09:07:12AM 9 points [-]

This is quite common argument, nevertheless I have never seen any detailed explanation of how having colonies could speed the developement. Comparison between different European countries suggests otherwise. For long time possessor of largest colonial empire, Spain, has briefly profited from colonial wealth in 16th century, a period followed by relatively slow developement leaving the country among the poorest in Europe in 19th century. There are many rich countries that never had any colonies.

And there is also quite standard argument that access to cheap labour or even slavery does more harm than good, because there is no motivation for inventions.

Comment author: multifoliaterose 13 September 2010 03:16:07PM *  1 point [-]

And there is also quite standard argument that access to cheap labour or even slavery does more harm than good, because there is no motivation for inventions.

Right, this is in line with what Collier says about having an abundance of lucrative natural resources paradoxically being detrimental to a developing world country.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 September 2010 11:07:39AM 1 point [-]

No motivation for inventions, or no motivation to improve the tools that slaves use?

Comment author: prase 13 September 2010 02:49:29PM 1 point [-]

Precisely, less motivation to improve work efficiency.