PhilGoetz comments on The conscious tape - Less Wrong

11 Post author: PhilGoetz 16 September 2010 07:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (113)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 17 September 2010 05:49:51PM 0 points [-]

The speed of light qualification is interesting, because it may relate to the static aspect of the "conscious tape". The computer is conscious in its reference frame; but since that clock is stopped, that consciousness will never begin.

Comment author: ciphergoth 18 September 2010 08:09:54AM 1 point [-]

As I observe to Vladimir_M, the "speed of light" thing was a mistake. I just wanted to make sure no-one ever observed any output from the computer under any circumstances.

Comment author: wedrifid 18 September 2010 02:48:32PM 3 points [-]

I just wanted to make sure no-one ever observed any output from the computer under any circumstances.

You could always just hide it in the forest near the oft-considered fallen tree.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 20 September 2010 03:56:23PM *  0 points [-]

No, I still think it's interesting. Define time as a function of entropy (eg., "one second" means the time over which entropy increases by a constant amount). Time is stopped in the piece of paper's reference frame, because the paper is static, and therefore has no entropy change, and therefore no passage of time.