erratio comments on Vote Qualifications, Not Issues - Less Wrong

10 Post author: jimrandomh 26 September 2010 08:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (185)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: mattnewport 27 September 2010 06:30:20PM 0 points [-]

he might also do a lot of damage by proposing policies that have unintended consequences he's never thought about.

Intelligence and expertise don't seem to be a reliable protection against this error either however.

Comment author: [deleted] 27 September 2010 06:40:14PM 2 points [-]

Well, sure. But that's precisely why I don't think "voting for qualifications" is a good idea.

The ways that a voter can gauge a politician's "qualification" -- his resume, his past accomplishments, even (someone suggested) his GPA -- would make government insiders and perhaps private-sector executives look the best, depending on where you put your emphasis. It wouldn't make truck drivers look good. If you're voting for a truck driver, it's either because you know him personally and know him to have good character (not true of most voters) or because it looks like he shares your values.