Mark_Friedenbach comments on Ben Goertzel: The Singularity Institute's Scary Idea (and Why I Don't Buy It) - Less Wrong

32 Post author: ciphergoth 30 October 2010 09:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (432)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: soreff 31 October 2010 04:49:39AM *  4 points [-]

Money is the nearest global equivalent of "utility". Law-abiding maximisation of it does not seem unreasonable.

On the other hand, maximization of money, including accurate terms for expected financial costs of legal penalties, can cause remarkable unreasonable behavior. As was repeated recently "It's hard for the idea of an agent with different terminal values to really sink in", in particular "something that could result in powerful minds that actually don't care about morality". A business that actually behaved as a pure profit maximizer would be such an entity.

Comment author: timtyler 31 October 2010 07:44:55AM *  0 points [-]

Morality is represented by legal constraints. That results in a "negative" morality, and - arguably -not a very good one.

Fortunately companies are also subject to many of the same forces that produce cooperation and niceness in the rest of biology - including reputations, reciprocal altruism and kin selection.