Eliezer Yudkowsky Facts

47steven046122 March 2009 08:17PM
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky was once attacked by a Moebius strip. He beat it to death with the other side, non-violently.
  • Inside Eliezer Yudkowsky's pineal gland is not an immortal soul, but another brain.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky's favorite food is printouts of Rice's theorem.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky's favorite fighting technique is a roundhouse dustspeck to the face.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky once brought peace to the Middle East from inside a freight container, through a straw.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky once held up a sheet of paper and said, "A blank map does not correspond to a blank territory". It was thus that the universe was created.
  • If you dial Chaitin's Omega, you get Eliezer Yudkowsky on the phone.
  • Unless otherwise specified, Eliezer Yudkowsky knows everything that he isn't telling you.
  • Somewhere deep in the microtubules inside an out-of-the-way neuron somewhere in the basal ganglia of Eliezer Yudkowsky's brain, there is a little XML tag that says awesome.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky is the Muhammad Ali of one-boxing.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky is a 1400 year old avatar of the Aztec god Aixitl.
  • The game of "Go" was abbreviated from "Go Home, For You Cannot Defeat Eliezer Yudkowsky".
  • When Eliezer Yudkowsky gets bored, he pinches his mouth shut at the 1/3 and 2/3 points and pretends to be a General Systems Vehicle holding a conversation among itselves. On several occasions he has managed to fool bystanders.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky has a swiss army knife that has folded into it a corkscrew, a pair of scissors, an instance of AIXI which Eliezer once beat at tic tac toe, an identical swiss army knife, and Douglas Hofstadter.
  • If I am ignorant about a phenomenon, that is not a fact about the phenomenon; it just means I am not Eliezer Yudkowsky.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky has no need for induction or deduction. He has perfected the undiluted master art of duction.
  • There was no ice age. Eliezer Yudkowsky just persuaded the planet to sign up for cryonics.
  • There is no spacetime symmetry. Eliezer Yudkowsky just sometimes holds the territory upside down, and he doesn't care.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky has no need for doctors. He has implemented a Universal Curing Machine in a system made out of five marbles, three pieces of plastic, and some of MacGyver's fingernail clippings.
  • Before Bruce Schneier goes to sleep, he scans his computer for uploaded copies of Eliezer Yudkowsky.

If you know more Eliezer Yudkowsky facts, post them in the comments.

Comments (85)

orthonormal31 July 2010 06:29:56PM7 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky can consistently assert the sentence "Eliezer Yudkowsky cannot consistently assert this sentence."

Wei_Dai29 July 2010 05:47:48PM* 12 points [-]

We're all living in a figment of Eliezer Yudkowsky's imagination, which came into existence as he started contemplating the potential consequences of deleting a certain Less Wrong post.

SilasBarta29 July 2010 06:06:28PM1 point [-]

Wow! So the real world never had the PUA flamewar!

Blueberry30 July 2010 07:29:04AM* 3 points [-]

No, the PUA flamewar occurred in both worlds: this world just diverged from the real one a few days ago, after Roko made his post.

NancyLebovitz30 July 2010 12:36:44AM1 point [-]

Eliezer may have a little more fondness for chaos than his non-fiction posts suggest.

Larks30 July 2010 11:04:51PM0 points [-]

Interesting thought:

Assume that our world can't survive by itself, and that this world is destroyed as soon as Eliezer finishes contemplating.

Assume we don't value worlds other than those that diverge from the current one, or at least that we care mainly about that one, and that we care more about worlds or people in proportion to their similarity to ours.

In order to keep this world (or collection of multiple-worlds) running for as long as possible, we need to estimate the utility of the Not-Deleting worlds, and keep our total utility close enough to theirs that Eliezer isn't confident enough to decide either way.

As a second goal, we need to make this set of worlds have a higher utility than the others, so that if he does finish contemplating, he'll decide in favour of ours.

These are just the general characteristics of this sort of world (similar to some of Robin Hanson's thought). Obveously, this contemplation is a special case, and we're not going to explain the special consequences in public.

Blueberry31 July 2010 12:03:13AM1 point [-]

Assume we don't value worlds other than those that diverge from the current one, or at least that we care mainly about that one, and that we care more about worlds or people in proportion to their similarity to ours.

But I care about the real world. If this world is just a hypothetical, why should I care about it? Also, the real me, in the real world, is very very similar to the hypothetical me. Out of over nine thousand days, there are only a few different ones.

As a second goal, we need to make this set of worlds have a higher utility than the others, so that if he does finish contemplating, he'll decide in favour of ours.

Because I care about the real world, I want the best outcome for it, which is that Eliezer keeps Roko's post. I'll lose the last few days, but that's okay: I'll just "pop" back to a couple days ago.

Note that if Eliezer does decide to delete the post in the real world, we'll still "pop" back as the hypothetical ends, and then re-live the last few days, possibly with some slight changes that Eliezer didn't contemplate in his hypothetical.

Larks31 July 2010 12:23:50AM0 points [-]

Well, this world is isomorphic to the real one. It's just like if we're actually in a Simulation; are simulated events any less significant to simulated beings than real events are to real beings?

Yes, if Eliezer goes for delete, we'll survive in a way, but we'll probably re-live all the time between the post and the Singularity, not just the last few days.

Blueberry31 July 2010 01:02:11AM0 points [-]

Yes, if Eliezer goes for delete, we'll survive in a way, but we'll probably re-live all the time between the post and the Singularity, not just the last few days.

If my cryonics revival only loses the last few days, I'll be ecstatic. I won't think, "well, I guess I survived in a way."

I'm not sure what you mean about re-living time in the future. How can I re-live it if I haven't lived it yet?

Eliezer_Yudkowsky31 July 2010 02:36:15AM* 5 points [-]

I don't understand this thread.

thomblake02 August 2010 07:09:52PM* 2 points [-]

I believe this relates to what has been called "[one's] strength as a rationalist".

Larks03 August 2010 12:35:44AM0 points [-]

Well, simulated-you will have experienced that period of time, and then 'real' you (or at least, the you that's in the same reality as Eliezer) will experience those events, after Eliezer stops contemplating.

thomblake18 May 2010 03:29:35PM4 points [-]
Will_Newsome16 April 2010 12:29:23AM1 point [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky is a superstimulus for perfection.

ata10 March 2010 05:44:43PM30 points [-]
Will_Newsome10 March 2010 11:36:59PM2 points [-]

This is amazing.

I for one think you should turn it into a post. Brilliant artwork should be rewarded, and not everyone will see it here.

(May be a stupid idea, but figured I'd raise the possibility.)

LucasSloan11 March 2010 01:25:42AM6 points [-]

It's good, but we should retain the top level post for things that are truly important.

ata11 March 2010 01:50:19AM* 5 points [-]

Thanks! Glad people like it, but I'll have to agree with Lucas — I prefer top-level posts to be on-topic, in-depth, and interesting (or at least two of those), and as I expect others feel the same way, I don't want a more worthy post to be pushed off the bottom of the list for the sake of a funny picture.

Will_Newsome10 March 2010 11:32:35PM6 points [-]

Unlike Frodo, Eliezer Yudkowsky had no trouble throwing the Ring into the fires of Mount Foom.

Will_Newsome10 March 2010 08:36:56AM* 7 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky can slay Omega with two suicide rocks and a sling.

Will_Newsome07 March 2010 09:24:22PM10 points [-]

Some people can perform surgery to save kittens. Eliezer Yudkowsky can perform counterfactual surgery to save kittens before they're even in danger.

JGWeissman07 March 2010 09:59:12PM4 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky once explained:

To answer precisely, you must use beliefs like Earth's gravity is 9.8 meters per second per second, and This building is around 120 meters tall. These beliefs are not wordless anticipations of a sensory experience; they are verbal-ish, propositional. It probably does not exaggerate much to describe these two beliefs as sentences made out of words. But these two beliefs have an inferential consequence that is a direct sensory anticipation - if the clock's second hand is on the 12 numeral when you drop the ball, you anticipate seeing it on the 5 numeral when you hear the crash.

Experiments conducted near the building in question determined the local speed of sound to be 6 meters per second.

(Hat Tip)

RolfAndreassen07 September 2009 08:00:44PM4 points [-]

You do not really know anything about Eliezer Yudkowsky until you can build one from rubber bands and paperclips. Unfortunately, doing so would require that you first transform all matter in the Universe into paperclips and rubber bands, otherwise you will not have sufficient raw materials. Consequently, if you are ignorant about Eliezer Ydkowsky (which has just been shown), this is a statement about Eliezer Yudkowsky, not about your state of knowledge.

Wei_Dai24 July 2009 02:55:20AM* 13 points [-]
  • After the truth destroyed everything it could, the only thing left was Eliezer Yudkowsky.
  • In his free time, Eliezer Yudkowsky likes to help the Halting Oracle answer especially difficult queries.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky actually happens to be the pinnacle of Intelligent Design. He only claims to be the product of evolution to remain approachable to the rest of us.
  • Omega did its Ph.D. thesis on Eliezer Yudkowsky. Needless to say, it's too long to be published in this world. Omega is now doing post-doctoral research, tentatively titled "Causality vs. Eliezer Yudkowsky - An Indistinguishability Argument".
Wei_Dai24 July 2009 11:02:03PM15 points [-]
  • It was easier for Eliezer Yudkowsky to reformulate decision theory to exclude time than to buy a new watch.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky's favorite sport is black hole diving. His information density is so great that no black hole can absorb him, so he just bounces right off the event horizon.
  • God desperately wants to believe that when Eliezer Yudkowsky says "God doesn't exist," it's just good-natured teasing.
  • Never go in against Eliezer Yudkowsky when anything is on the line.
James_Miller16 June 2009 06:38:26PM* 4 points [-]

The Busy Beaver function was created to quantify Eliezer Yudkowsky 's IQ.

SilasBarta17 June 2009 01:54:12AM1 point [-]

There is no "time", just events Eliezer Yudkowsky has felt like allowing.

insaneabd14 April 2009 08:07:11PM1 point [-]

An Eliezer Yudkowsky article a day keeps irrationality away.

Peter_de_Blanc25 March 2009 03:10:32AM18 points [-]

Reversed stupidity is not Eliezer Yudkowsky.

orthonormal24 March 2009 06:07:13PM11 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky knows exactly how best to respond to this thread; he's just left it as homework for us.

Cyan24 March 2009 03:15:36AM* 8 points [-]
  • a mixture of two parts Red Bull to one part Eliezer Yudkowsky creates a universal question solvent.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky experiences all paths through configuration space because he only constructively interferes with himself.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky's mental states are not ontologically fundamental, but only because he chooses so of his own free will.
CronoDAS24 March 2009 03:11:15AM7 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowski can solve NP complete problems in polynomial time.

SilasBarta17 June 2009 06:18:17PM0 points [-]

...because he made a halting oracle his bitch. "Oh yeah baby, show me that busy beaver ... function value."

roland24 March 2009 02:32:44AM* 6 points [-]
  • When Eliezer Yudkowsky wakes up in the morning he asks himself: why do I believe that I'm Eliezer Yudkowsky?
gwern24 March 2009 12:42:57AM8 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky's favorite food is printouts of Rice's theorem.

This isn't bad, but I think it can be better. Here's my try:

You eat Rice Krispies for breakfast; Eliezer Yudkowsky eats Rice theorems.

PhilGoetz23 March 2009 12:04:52PM* 38 points [-]
  • If you put Eliezer Yudkowsky in a box, the rest of the universe is in a state of quantum superposition until you open it again.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky can prove it's not butter.
  • If you say Eliezer Yudkowsky's name 3 times out loud, it prevents anything magical from happening.
steven046123 March 2009 02:46:26PM9 points [-]

Snow is white if and only if that's what Eliezer Yudkowsky wants to believe.

Warrigal18 October 2009 02:19:21AM12 points [-]

Ironically, this is mathematically true. (Assuming Eliezer hasn't forsaken epistemic rationality, that is.) It's just that if Eliezer changes what he wants to believe, the color of snow won't change to reflect it.

JohannesDahlstrom01 April 2010 09:01:25AM4 points [-]

It's just that if Eliezer changes what he wants to believe, the color of snow won't change to reflect it.

What?! Blasphemy!

Liron23 March 2009 09:08:15AM25 points [-]

Eliezer two-boxes on Newcomb's problem, and both boxes contain money.

SamE13 July 2010 06:17:17AM* 2 points [-]
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky two-boxes on Newcomb's problem, and both boxes contain $1 million.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky two-boxes on Newcomb's problem, and both boxes contain solid utils.
PhilGoetz23 March 2009 02:19:01AM* 26 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky made a mistake once - but only so he could calibrate his confidence level.

PhilGoetz23 March 2009 02:06:03AM* 22 points [-]
  • Omega one-boxes against Eliezer Yudkowsky.
  • If Michelson and Morley had lived A.Y., they would have found that the speed of light was relative to Eliezer Yudkowsky.
  • Turing machines are not Eliezer-complete.
  • The fact that the Bible contains errors doesn't prove there is no God. It just proves that God shouldn't try to play Eliezer Yudkowsky.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky has measure 1.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky doesn't wear glasses to see better. He wears glasses that distort his vision, to avoid violating the uncertainty principle.
Technologos23 March 2009 04:05:31AM* 15 points [-]
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky has counted to Aleph 3^^^3.
  • The payoff to defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma against Eliezer Yudkowsky is a paperclip. In the eye.
  • The Peano axioms are complete and consistent for Eliezer Yudkowsky.
  • In an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma between Chuck Norris and Eliezer Yudkowsky, Chuck always cooperates and Eliezer defects. Chuck knows not to mess with his superiors.
  • Eliezer Yudkowsky's brain actually exists in a Hilbert space.
  • In Japan, it is common to hear the phrase Eliezer naritai!
Jonii12 August 2010 05:24:38PM2 points [-]

Eliezer naritai!

Kinda irrelevant, but this should be "Eliezer ni naritai", since omitting "ni" is only for some rare Japanese adjectives, rite?

Yvain22 March 2009 09:07:07PM* 38 points [-]

Ooh, this is fun.

Robert Aumann has proven that ideal Bayesians cannot disagree with Eliezer Yudkowsky.
Eliezer Yudkowsky can make AIs Friendly by glaring at them.
Angering Eliezer Yudkowsky is a global existential risk
Eliezer Yudkowsky thought he was wrong one time, but he was mistaken.
Eliezer Yudkowsky predicts Omega's actions with 100% accuracy
An AI programmed to maximize utility will tile the Universe with tiny copies of Eliezer Yudkowksy.

dclayh25 March 2009 04:10:26AM2 points [-]

Eliezer can in fact tile the Universe with himself, simply by slicing himself into finitely many pieces. The only reason the rest of us are here is quantum immortality.

SoullessAutomaton23 March 2009 02:30:29AM22 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky can make AIs Friendly by glaring at them.

And the first action of any Friendly AI will be to create a nonprofit institute to develop a rigorous theory of Eliezer Yudkowsky. Unfortunately, it will turn out to be an intractable problem.

Yvain23 March 2009 10:42:15AM21 points [-]

Transhuman AIs theorize that if they could create Eliezer Yudkowsky, it would lead to an "intelligence explosion".

Liron23 March 2009 09:10:08AM5 points [-]

Angering Eliezer Yudkowsky is a global existential risk

Where's the punch line?

Anatoly_Vorobey22 March 2009 09:28:23PM13 points [-]

Robert Aumann has proven that ideal Bayesians cannot disagree with Eliezer Yudkowsky.

... because all of them are Eliezer Yudkowsky.

They call it "spontaneous symmetry breaking", because Eliezer Yudkowsky just felt like breaking something one day.

Particles in parallel universes interfere with each other all the time, but nobody interferes with Eliezer Yudkowsky.

An oracle for the Halting Problem is Eliezer Yudkowsky's cellphone number.

When tachyons get confused about their priors and posteriors, they ask Eliezer Yudkowsky for help.

badger22 March 2009 09:37:02PM* 17 points [-]

Everything is reducible -- to Eliezer Yudkowsky.

Scientists only wear lab coats because Eliezer Yudkowsky has yet to be seen wearing a clown suit.

Algorithms want to know how Eliezer Yudkowsky feels from the inside.

badger22 March 2009 09:41:53PM16 points [-]

Teachers try to guess Eliezer Yudkowsky's password.

Yvain22 March 2009 09:53:13PM* 35 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky's map is more accurate than the territory.

Lightwave24 July 2009 02:36:22PM9 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky's map IS the territory.

khafra16 April 2010 11:52:44AM10 points [-]

I'd prefer "Eliezer Yudkowsky can fold up the territory and put it in his pocket."

SilasBarta16 June 2009 07:31:59PM6 points [-]

One time Eliezer Yudkowsky got into a debate with the universe about whose map best corresponded to territory. He told the universe he'd meet it outside and they could settle the argument once and for all.

He's still waiting.

badger22 March 2009 09:53:31PM8 points [-]

P-zombies gain qualia after being in the presence of Eliezer Yudkowsky.

dfranke22 March 2009 09:17:07PM16 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky can escape an AI box while wearing a straight jacket and submerged in a shark tank.

steven046122 March 2009 08:51:25PM* 1 point [-]

If it's apparently THAT bad an idea (and/or execution), is it considered bad form to just delete the whole thing?

(edit: this post now obsolete; thanks, all)

gjm22 March 2009 09:23:58PM11 points [-]

Add me to the list of people who thought it was laugh-out-loud funny. I'm glad this sort of thing doesn't make up a large fraction of LW articles but please, no, don't delete it.

CarlShulman22 March 2009 09:02:29PM5 points [-]

I laughed out loud, and I'd say keep it but don't promote it..

Z_M_Davis22 March 2009 08:53:45PM4 points [-]

Leave it up! This is hilarious; thank you!

pjeby22 March 2009 09:03:01PM17 points [-]

I agree as well.

ObEliezerFact: Eliezer Yudkowsky didn't run away from grade school... grade school ran away from Eliezer Yudkowsky.

ciphergoth22 March 2009 10:52:15PM2 points [-]

No, I like this game! Nearly all the ones up to and including one-boxing are giggle-out-loud funny, and there are some gems after that too.

BrentAllsop24 July 2009 01:36:32AM0 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky doesn't fear unfriendly AI, he just wants everyone else to fear them.

xamdam29 July 2010 07:41:23PM-1 points [-]
  • The problem with CEV is that the coherence requirement will force it to equal to whatever Eliezer wants in the limit.