= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Vladimir_Nesov comments on Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (425)
This statement seems misleading, since justification doesn't actually "hit bottom", doesn't stop. For contrast, a quotation from the post:
I think that sentence was written just to include the names of the articles when linking them, not because it should be taken literally.
I don't expect Luke misunderstood the posts in question to the point of making this error, so I'm not talking about his intention behind writing the statement. I'm merely pointing out that, as written, it's somewhat misleading, whatever the circumstances that shaped it.
I'm struggling to come up with a very quick way to say this more accurately in the post. Can you think of anything?
Does "justification rests in the lens that can see its flaws" work?
I chose this one, thanks.
Say, "The process of justification should never stop, not even flaws in the lens itself are to be overlooked."