= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
paper-machine comments on Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (425)
The ironic bit is that I don't know a modern philosophy journal that accepts TeX.
EDIT: Minds and Machines, as mentioned below. Also, Mind doesn't.
You just export to PDF. Lyx is a fairly easy-to-use LaTeX editor.
That doesn't make sense to me. One can't re-typeset PDF -- well, perhaps you can, but I can't imagine it would be easy.
I'm a bit confused. What I'm used to is, I make a TeX document (editable) then I typeset it into a PDF document. Anybody can read the PDF, but can't edit it. If I want the receiver to be able to edit, I send both the TeX file and the PDF.
Did you mean that philosophy journals won't accept the .tex file format, or that they'll reject a .pdf written in LaTeX for stylistic reasons?
Adobe's business model is to give away the reader for free and then sell the editor for a profit. So I would guess most publishers would have no problem.
Hey, I didn't say it wasn't a diseased discipline. :P
Last I checked, Minds and Machines requires LaTeX.
Ah, okay. I knew Mind didn't, and now I realize I was generalizing from one example. Oops.