That sounds obvious. No?

Not at all. What you call "qualia" could be the combination of a mental symbol, the connections and associations this symbol has and various abstract entities. When you experience experiencing such a "quale" the actual symbol might or might not be replaced with a symbol for the symbol, possibly using a set of neural machinery overlapping with the set for the actual symbol (so you can remember or imagine things without causing all of the involuntary reactions the actual experience causes)

qualia are not represented but directly experienced. Can you give a definition of these qualia?

That sounds obvious. Sounding obvious and being true are two very different things.