Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

paper-machine comments on Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline - Less Wrong

88 Post author: lukeprog 28 March 2011 07:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (431)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 March 2011 06:31:40AM 6 points [-]

It's somewhat painful to read. I've tried to read it in the past and get a bit eyesore after the first twenty pages.

Doing the math, I realize it's probably irrational for Yudkowsky-san to spend time learning LaTeX or some other serious typesetting system, but I can dream, right?

Comment author: lukeprog 13 July 2012 04:58:53AM 11 points [-]

Your dream has come true.

Comment author: [deleted] 13 July 2012 05:41:24AM 2 points [-]

Happiness is too general a term to express my current state of mind.

May the karma flow through you like so many grains of sand through a sieve.

Comment author: wedrifid 13 July 2012 05:50:06AM 0 points [-]

May the karma flow through you like so many grains of sand through a sieve.

Not quite sure how this one works. Usually I associate sieve with "leaking like a sieve", generally a bad thing---do you want all his karma to be assassinated away as fast as it comes?

Comment author: [deleted] 13 July 2012 06:03:17AM 2 points [-]

Oh, no. Lukeprog is the sieve, and the grains of sand are whatever fraction of a hedon he gets from being upvoted.

Comment author: gmpalmer 10 December 2012 02:23:43PM *  0 points [-]

I hope this is corrected later in the paper and my apologies if this is a stupid question but could you please explain how the example of gum chewing and abscesses makes sense?

That is, in the explanation you are making your decision based on evidence. Indeed, you'd be happy--or anyone would be happy--to hear you're chewing gum once the results of the second study are known. How is that causal and not evidential?

I see later in the paper that gum chewing is evidence for the CGTA gene but that doesn't make any sense. You can't change whether or not you have the gene and the gum chewing is better for you at any rate. Still confused about the value of the gum chewing example.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 30 March 2011 10:14:56AM *  5 points [-]

The LaTeX to format a document like that can be learnt in an hour or two with no previous experience, assuming at least basic technically-minded smarts.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 30 March 2011 12:10:42PM *  5 points [-]

The LaTeX to format a document like that can be learnt in an hour or two

And the learning (and formatting of the document) does not have to be done by the author of the document.