Your post lead me by tangent to wonder, especially in on-line formats, how often people simply don't respond to arguments that they agree with.
In my case, frequently-- and more so if the argument hasn't added anything to my understanding of the matter.
There seems to be a hole in English (I don't know about other languages) for efficiently describing how much attention you've paid to an argument.
I can think of a variety of amounts and sorts of attention-- looks cool and plausible, examined for attractive arguments against the other side, checked math for accuracy, checked math for plausibility of application, looked for counter-arguments, looked for evidence in favor, checked factual material, checked for whether some parts are sound even if there are some errors.....
Any other suggestions for types of attention?