Posts

Sorted by New

Wiki Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
dares00

The minus one must be for not seeing two fallacies and a bias in such a pretty package. Oh well, can't win em all.

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
dares-20

Please don't hastily dismiss my quote, I haven't had breakfast yet.

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
dares00

"Please don't disillusion me. I haven't had breakfast yet." -Orson Scott Card, _Children of the Mind

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
dares50

Also, "short is good" would narrow this quotes focus considerably.

dares00

New here, sorry for the redundancy. I probably should have guessed that such a popular quote had been used.

dares40

Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.

—Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

dares130

“In life as in poker, the occasional coup does not necessarily demonstrate skill and superlative performance is not the ability to eliminate chance, but the capacity to deliver good outcomes over and over again. That is how we know Warren Buffett is a skilled investor and Johnny Chan a skilled poker player.” — John Kay, Financial Times

dares10

Your post lead me by tangent to wonder, especially in on-line formats, how often people simply don't respond to arguments that they agree with.

dares00

This made me think of a sports gambling database and strategy set that I read about in an ESPN magazine at a barber shop. I don't remember the specifics but I recall that the database was shared by invitation only and had an intentional "barrier to entry" level buy in, which seemed high to me. The article claimed the database was in use by only 9 professional gamblers. I'd like to see some performance data on their bets.

Load More