Psy-Kosh comments on Rationality Quotes: April 2011 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: benelliott 04 April 2011 09:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (384)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 09 April 2011 06:29:08AM 11 points [-]

A missile silo disguised as a windmill? A helicopter in an unfortunate position? An odd and inefficient form of rotating radar antenna? A shuttle in launch position? (if one squints, they might think it's a broken windmill with the vanes having fallen off or something)

These are all just off the top of my head. Remember, if we're talking about someone who tends to, when they see a windmill, be unsure whether it's a windmill or an evil giant, there's probably a reasonable chance that they tend to get confused by other objects too, right? :)

Comment author: shokwave 09 April 2011 06:31:45AM 5 points [-]

You are right! Even I, firmly settled in the fourth camp, was tricked by the false dichotomy of windmill and evil giant.

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 09 April 2011 06:41:11AM 3 points [-]

To be fair, there's also the possibility that someone disguised a windmill as an evil giant. ;)

Comment author: benelliott 10 April 2011 11:04:59AM 4 points [-]

A good giant?

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 10 April 2011 04:18:26PM 8 points [-]

Sure, but I wouldn't give a "good giant" really any more probability than an "evil giant". Both fall into the "completely negligible" hole. :)

Though, as we all know, if we do find one, the correct action to take is to climb up so that one can stand on its shoulders. :)

Comment author: benelliott 10 April 2011 04:54:37PM 4 points [-]

I thought we were listing anything at least as plausible as the evil giant hypothesis. I have no information as the morality distribution of giants in general so I use maximum entropy and assign 'evil giant' and 'good giant' equal probability.

Comment author: ata 10 April 2011 06:23:27PM *  10 points [-]

Given complexity of value, 'evil giant' and 'good giant' should not be weighted equally; if we have no specific information about the morality distribution of giants, then as with any optimization process, 'good' is a much, much smaller target than 'evil' (if we're including apparently-human-hostile indifference).

Unless we believe them to be evolutionarily close to humans, or to have evolved under some selection pressures similar to those that produced morality, etc., in which we can do a bit better than a complexity prior for moral motivations.

(For more on this, check out my new blog, Overcoming Giants.)

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 10 April 2011 08:18:34PM 3 points [-]

Well, if by giants we mean "things that seem to resemble humans only are particularly big", then we should expect some sort of shared evolutionary history, so....

Comment author: TheOtherDave 10 April 2011 04:32:56PM 0 points [-]

Which can be fun to do with a windmill, also.

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 10 April 2011 04:34:50PM 1 point [-]

Since when do windmills have shoulders? :)

Comment author: wedrifid 09 April 2011 08:34:39AM *  3 points [-]

Or, possibly, a great big fan! In fact with some (unlikely) designs it would be impossible to tell whether it was a fan or a windmill without knowledge of what is on the other end of the connected power lines.