Peterdjones comments on Pluralistic Moral Reductionism - Less Wrong

33 Post author: lukeprog 01 June 2011 12:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (316)
Tags: metaethics morality

Comments (316)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 07 June 2011 11:13:41AM 1 point [-]

If no logically consistent theory is offered, you don't have to do any more.

I suppose you mean "if no theory of morality based on logical consistency is offered".

Of course, one could make an attempt to research reason-based metaethics before discarding the whole idea.

Comment author: TimFreeman 07 June 2011 01:40:52PM *  -1 points [-]

I suppose you mean "if no theory of morality based on logical consistency is offered".

Agreed and edited.

Of course, one could make an attempt to research reason-based metaethics before discarding the whole idea.

I observe that you didn't offer a pointer to a theory of morality based on logical consistency.

I agree with Eby: you are a troll. I'm done here.

Comment author: Peterdjones 07 June 2011 02:03:51PM *  1 point [-]

I observe that you didn't offer a pointer to a theory of morality based on logical consistency.

For one thing, I don't think logical consistency is quite the right criterion for reason-based objective morality. Pointing out that certain ideas are old and well documented, is offering a pointer, and is not trolling.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit