timtyler comments on Richard Dawkins on vivisection: "But can they suffer?" - Less Wrong

14 Post author: XiXiDu 04 July 2011 04:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (49)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 06 July 2011 05:01:42PM *  1 point [-]

People championing a cause for the wrong reasons does not make the cause itself invalid.

True. I don't think there is anything "wrong" about wanting to be seen to be good, though. That goodness is attractive and that people like to be seen to be good is one of the great things about the world. Thank goodness for those fuzzies. We could be living in a much more evilicious environment.

Comment author: endoself 06 July 2011 06:18:25PM 0 points [-]

Wrong as in not-truth-seeking. If we want to find good causes, this is the wrong evidence to use.

Comment author: timtyler 06 July 2011 07:02:10PM -1 points [-]

Wrong as in not-truth-seeking.

For me that would be quite a stretch. "Wrong" doesn't have "not-truth-seeking" as a meaning in any dictionary I am familiar with.

Comment author: endoself 06 July 2011 10:23:30PM *  0 points [-]

I didn't find that usage unnatural at all, considering that this website is about norms that can help people seek truth. The people that Kaj was talking about are violating the norms that we discuss here.