Andrew comments on You don't need Kant - Less Wrong

21 Post author: Andrew 01 April 2009 06:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Andrew 02 April 2009 01:09:46AM 1 point [-]

I used Plato as an example of this because the first example that came to mind was classical philosophy, or at least the parts of it that aren't more properly philology.

I'm generalizing over my experiences at philosophy conferences, mainly in the Midwestern United States, and my reading of various philosophical journals. I'm basing my claim on, among other things, what seems to be the common practice of classifying some philosophers as for example "Kant scholars", "Continentals", etc. It's possible I'm wrong. I'm not a professional philosopher. I still think many philosophers think this way. That's where I get this perception.