ciphergoth has made an epub version of Eliezer's posts, which can be read with iBooks on the iPad (or iPhone, iPod Touch). I would recommend this over a PDF version, as you cannot adjust line lengths with PDFs. I've been reading the sequences in this way recently. Before discovering this, I used the Instapaper app to save the LW web pages.
Appropriate for this forum: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity by Scott Aaronson
Ugh. If you're going to read that, perhaps also read the other papers mentioned here: < http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/fa11/6.893/index.html >.
Computer Science, including AI - University of Cambridge Computer Lab Tech Reports http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-table.html
http://www.e-booksdirectory.com/
http://www.intechopen.com/books and http://www.intechopen.com/journals
And National Academies Press - http://www.nap.edu
You will find lots of interesting books, no matter what your specific interests are.
If you go to 4shared, you can find a lot of PDF books that have seen prominent mentions or recommendations around here. For example:
Gödel, Escher, Bach
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science
The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences
How the Mind Works
The Nature of Rationality
Good and Real
The Strategy of Conflict
You can also take a look at Bostrom's or Hanson's papers, or at SIAI's list of publications. They are pretty interesting.
The GEB pdf seems to have a lot of OCR errors. If anyone has read the pdf -- is it worth reading despite the errors?
The page with the DJVU is asking for a password.
First and foremost, textbooks. I cannot emphasize enough how useful the iPad is vis-a-vis reading on a computer for any long-form material. If you've been putting off sequences, now is a good time as well.
Several of Greg Egan's stories are available online for free.
If you're interested in long-form journalism, here's a list of recommendations for recent articles and here are some recommendations for classic articles.
The appropriateness of the post depends entirely on the set of answers asked after. It is therefore incumbent on LessWrongians to answer with PDFs which are rationality-enhancing or which explore its associatd issues.
Wow, negative 6 karma? I'm surprised. Obviously, I was deliberately rough when there's no reason for being rough. Maybe I did something wrong? Let me take a look at myself.
First of all, I dislike Apple, and I dislike people bragging about having a product from Apple. I could list plenty of reasons for this, but my reasons don't matter.
When I first read this discussion thread, the word "iPad" sprang to my eye quickly (it's the fifth word in the article, after all). That made my alarm bells ring and it promoted the hypothesis "this person wants to show off that they own an iPad". When I continued reading, I found more evidence for this (already and probably wrongfully promoted) hypothesis:
for the first time in my life it's convenient for me to read long documents from the internet. I've often looked at things and thought, oh, if I ever have some capability to read that, I should.
This read like what I'd expect from someone who wants to show the world that they own an Apple product. The message that reached me was roughly this: "An iPad is sooo useful for reading pdfs! Throw away those normal computers, it's so inconvenient to read pdfs with them!"
This conflicted with my experience: I don't find it inconvenient at all to read pdfs on a computer. What problems could one have with that? Why on earth should reading pdfs improve so dramatically with such a device?
This was to me evidence that this user in fact only wanted to show off, as well as the mere existence of this post: Finding recommendable pdfs is something I wouldn't say is difficult at all, just search lw for the topic you want to know something about. This was further evidence for the already promoted hypothesis, I came to the conclusion that this user probably really wasn't quite as much interested in pdfs but rather in some sort of online-"status".
Thusly, I wrote that pretty harsh comment.
The mass of negative Karma (and your comment), however, indicates that I indeed went wrong somewhere. Probably the OP in fact doesn't want to show off at all, and I was just unreasonable. I have to apologize.
That said, I want to know this: How does an iPad make reading long pdfs that much more convenient? Does it greatly improve productivity?
What about Apple products in general? Do I falsely believe that they're just overly expensive accessoires for showing high status without being more useful than other mobile phones (iPhone), multimedia devices (iPod), netbooks (iPad) and computers (Mac)?
And to talk about apple users, I obviously do falsely believe that most of them mainly buy such products to show high-status. I better revise this belief.
I hate pdfs. There's no way to make the pages fit the computer screen as conveniently as html does.
I have to keep moving my viewpoint in a way that jolts my attention.
Recently, instead of having a control bar for the pdf at the top of the page, there's a appear/fade away control bar which is affected by the cursor, and IT'S ON TOP OF THE TEXT.
Of course, I have no way of knowing whether any of this is why Solvent hasn't liked them.
I just got an iPad, which means that for the first time in my life it's convenient for me to read long documents from the internet. I've often looked at things and thought, oh, if I ever have some capability to read that, I should. However, I haven't made a list.
So. What documents in pdf form, or long websites, should I read now that I can? Any recommendations?
EDIT: Thanks for the advice. I'm particularly excited to read Godel, Escher, Bach. I've also downloaded the ePub of the Sequences, and I'm going to certainly look at Strategy of Conflict. Thank you very much for the links.