I looked at the wiki, as recommended in the original article and it said several times that in the models being used, mating is assumed to be random. What happens when you alter the model so it has mate-choice, as many species do in the wild?
Also, the wiki article also said something about assuming perfect selection. Does modelling selection as imperfect gain you anything?
What sorts of species don't have mate choice? What is the most complex/evolved one (I have no clue what the proper terminology is)?
Today's post, Natural Selection's Speed Limit and Complexity Bound was originally published on 04 November 2007. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).
This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Evolutions Are Stupid (But Work Anyways), and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.
Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.