Luke_A_Somers comments on Great Explanations - Less Wrong

23 Post author: lukeprog 31 October 2011 11:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (113)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 02 November 2011 12:33:07AM 1 point [-]

The math of special relativity helps not one whit in solving problems 1, 2 and 4. Problem 3 of course can be answered qualitatively without math, but to indicate with any specificity you will need math.

Moreover, you can be quite proficient with the math of SR and be floored by these. I knew an undergrad who could do acceleration problems yet couldn't work his way through problem 1, because the course had focused on gamma and neglected spacetime diagrams.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 02 November 2011 07:10:14AM *  3 points [-]

Spacetime diagrams are the math of special relativity. Doing algebra with gammas without insight on how it relates to the Minkowski spacetime is like the proverbial blind men grasping various parts of the elephant. (Why such godawful approaches are still foisted upon students is a mystery to me.)

Comment author: pragmatist 02 November 2011 07:40:20AM 1 point [-]

I think someone without a detailed grasp of spacetime diagrams should be able to answer problem 1, as long as they know the following principles:

Gur eryngvivgl bs fvzhygnarvgl

Ab fhcreyhzvany fvtanyvat