It strikes me that having scientists deliberately lie as policy would have terribly, terribly bad secondary effects - enough people distrust sound science as it is. Therefore, I very much hope you were being sarcastic or something.
I was being serious, although if (and I have no reason to doubt) Logos01 is correct then my idea is probably a bad one.
enough people distrust sound science as it is.
True but not enough people distrust unsound science or political advocates who pose as scientists.
I'm woefully underinformed on this topic, but this doesn't seem good at all:
I feel as though I ought provide more commentary instead of just an article dump, but I feel more strongly than that that what I have to say would be obvious or stupid or both, so.