wedrifid comments on What Curiosity Looks Like - Less Wrong

31 Post author: lukeprog 06 January 2012 09:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (283)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 15 January 2012 04:53:34AM 1 point [-]
  1. See interesting-looking book.
  2. Decide whether to get hold of it.
  3. If 2 returns 'Yea', decide whether to buy or pirate it.

4. Decide whether to tell people about my criminal tendencies on the internet.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 January 2012 05:13:04AM 2 points [-]

criminal

As a legal term, "criminal" does not apply here.

Comment author: Anubhav 15 January 2012 04:57:59AM 1 point [-]

So it's fine to discuss the morality of infanticide and baby-eating, but IP infringement is taboo? :P

Comment author: [deleted] 15 January 2012 05:13:43AM 1 point [-]

No, but you should Taboo most of the words usually used, because they are not useful.

Comment author: Anubhav 15 January 2012 05:21:48AM 1 point [-]

Mm? What words are you talking about? I do contend that 'pirate' is a useful and concise verb for 'obtain a file for free over the internet'. (Although, now that I think about it, that's not what it technically means, and 'filesharing' is probably a better word for the act. Then again, 'fileshare' isn't commonly used as a verb.)

Comment author: wedrifid 15 January 2012 05:55:13AM 2 points [-]

I do contend that 'pirate' is a useful and concise verb for 'obtain a file for free over the internet'.

That's true, it is just perhaps not a useful verb in this context because there are moral connotations.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 January 2012 05:25:07AM 1 point [-]

"Theft" and "Piracy" are both Bad Words in this context. "Theft" because it doesn't actually apply, "Piracy" because it fails to carve reality at the joints (lumps high-seas theft and murder with copying).

The word you are looking for is "Copy". Nice and short, captures all the important aspects, doesn't have too much political or moral connotation.

Comment author: Anubhav 15 January 2012 05:26:41AM 0 points [-]

Duly noted.

Comment author: wedrifid 15 January 2012 05:53:14AM 0 points [-]

So it's fine to discuss the morality of infanticide and baby-eating, but IP infringement is taboo? :P

Taboo? No, there's no taboo. It's a question of honesty being (potentially) instrumentally detrimental to you!

Comment author: Anubhav 15 January 2012 06:06:42AM 0 points [-]

The probability of that is really astronomically small in this case, but point taken.

Comment author: wedrifid 15 January 2012 06:43:43AM 1 point [-]

The probability of that is really astronomically small in this case, but point taken.

It does seem that way. But who knows what the future may bring? Words on the internet have a nasty habit of sticking around.

Comment author: Anubhav 15 January 2012 07:16:13AM *  -2 points [-]

The possibility of the rise of a sinister figure in the future that visits vengeance upon everyone who has ever demonstrated sympathy for copyright infringement doesn't really push up my probability estimate, sorry.

(Really, by the most likely way I can think of this causing trouble is if any of a certain group of powerful organisations that I won't name here gets pissed off at me and decides to come after me with every single thing they can dig up. But that's still a really small possibility and this thread will be the least of my worries if it really comes to that.)