Curiouskid comments on Request for advice- Reading on politics - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Curiouskid 05 January 2012 09:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Curiouskid 06 January 2012 07:54:41PM 3 points [-]

Well, it is certainly not my intent to spark mind-killing discussions, and I made sure I read the mind-killer sequence before I posted here. I do think that there is a difference between descriptive politics ( e.g.describing the workings of the EPA) and and normative (woo liberatarians!). Perhaps I should have made that distinction in my post.

Also, where else would I get good advice on politics?

Comment author: fortyeridania 07 January 2012 01:14:38AM 2 points [-]

Yes, there is a difference between descriptive politics and normative. But like economics, the two easily run together, in the minds of writers and readers alike. I think people are overconfident in their own ability to distinguish positive and normative discourse, especially in politics. Even factual descriptions can piss people off who are used to thinking the opposite. And while there's benefit to correcting their false beliefs, the chances of actually doing so are thin, and the chances of a forum-polluting flamewar or signalfest are high.

As for where to get advice, why not an avowedly political forum? You could start with whatever political blogs you frequent. The audience of such fora have already self-selected for interest in politics. You could probably ask professors of political science, too. Just find their contact info on the university website and write them an e-mail.

Good luck. It sounds like an interesting study you're trying to do.