poll comments on What isn't the wiki for? - Less Wrong

8 Post author: ciphergoth 07 April 2009 10:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: poll 07 April 2009 01:02:22PM *  0 points [-]

Poll: Should aim 3 above (providing an [incomplete] list of open problems, and wanted articles, together with an indication of how those open problems would contribute to LW's overall project) be one of the aims of the LW wiki?

Comment author: poll 07 April 2009 01:02:44PM 5 points [-]

Vote this comment up if your impression is "Yes".

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 07 April 2009 02:46:10PM 0 points [-]

Hum. I voted this comment up to 2, but now I see that it's down to 1 again. People who disagree shouldn't vote this down but rather vote up the "no" comment, right?

Comment author: ciphergoth 07 April 2009 03:48:03PM 1 point [-]

Yes. The same happened to me, and I just assumed that the "poll" user had removed their own upvote after I voted to make voting zero-based, but it looks like we shouldn't trust the results of this poll. I don't think a poll is a good way to settle things like this anyway; it's better to hear what people think.

Comment author: poll 07 April 2009 01:02:58PM 1 point [-]

Vote this comment up if your impression is "No".