[META] Karma, its positive and negative component

15 Post author: Thomas 25 January 2012 09:31PM

I'd like to see, beside the cumulative karma as it is now, also its analytic. Does my 0 points somewhere means no upvotes and no downvotes or +7 and -7, for example?

A timeline graph would also be appreciated.

 

Comments (22)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 26 January 2012 09:29:57AM 10 points [-]

I'd like to see recent karma changes for my comments and posts.

Comment author: TimS 26 January 2012 05:22:38PM 0 points [-]

I'd love that too, but my understanding is that it is exceedingly hard to implement.

Comment author: amcknight 26 January 2012 09:09:17PM 6 points [-]

I want to vote for and against the same post sometimes. Not too useful, but might help for ordering by controversial

Comment author: Grognor 26 January 2012 03:06:03PM 4 points [-]

I've been clamoring to see the upvotes and downvotes for comments since the beginning.

I've never seen a case for the current system as opposed to the more informative system.

I'm tired of the lack of acknowledgement that this position even exists, but I don't see that ever changing.

Comment author: thomblake 26 January 2012 05:20:21PM 5 points [-]

This has been on the issues list forever.

Comment author: lukeprog 26 January 2012 05:12:10PM 5 points [-]

Position acknowledged.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 January 2012 09:36:02PM 6 points [-]

Also, can we change things to only show votes for our own posts? Vote being visible is too much priming that leads to too much hivemind.

Comment author: Unnamed 26 January 2012 02:49:39AM 12 points [-]

There's a Less Wrong anti-kibitzer which you can install in your browser to hide that info.

Comment author: thomblake 25 January 2012 10:10:29PM 10 points [-]

Vote being visible is too much priming that leads to too much hivemind.

Meh. It also leads to corrective votes and pointing out when something is hidden that isn't that bad.

Comment author: falenas108 25 January 2012 11:08:35PM 18 points [-]

Although it does cause some hiveminding, I like that the votes are visible to everyone. Many times I'm just skimming past comments, and if I see a +20 I know the person probably said something important, whereas otherwise I might have skipped over it.

Comment author: faul_sname 26 January 2012 12:32:18AM *  17 points [-]

Though, as a general rule, we probably shouldn't upvote comments found in this way.

Edit: and this comment is a perfect example of why we shouldn't. Ironically.

Comment author: faul_sname 25 January 2012 10:38:41PM *  2 points [-]

Yes, great comment. I knew it would be good as soon as I say that it was rated +2.

Seriously, though, showing votes for only your own posts would probably be a large improvement. Why are votes even visible? Make it so we still can have a comment rating threshold, but can't see karma otherwise.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 28 January 2012 07:06:10PM *  2 points [-]

The anti-kibitzer will do that, though it also hides poster names (which I felt was preventing me from getting to know anyone). It's accessible from your account settings.

(Edited for politer tone)

Comment author: faul_sname 29 January 2012 07:31:58AM 1 point [-]

Awesome. Thank you.

Comment author: Bogomilist 25 January 2012 10:55:08PM 0 points [-]

It's somewhat annoying that I can't post until I get karma.

Comment author: Emile 25 January 2012 10:58:29PM *  17 points [-]

But do you find it annoying that other people can't post until they get karma? Do you wish there were more top-level posts by people with no karma?

(or, to make even more of a leading question, do you wish that new people who had an idea for a post but no karma didn't lurk and comment for a week or two before showing their idea?)

Comment author: FAWS 25 January 2012 11:58:00PM *  10 points [-]

By posting a comment in the welcome thread you can pretty reliably get enough karma to post in the discussion section.

Comment author: Bogomilist 26 January 2012 01:08:15AM *  8 points [-]

That was helpful, thanks! That would have been difficult for me to find otherwise.

Comment author: faul_sname 25 January 2012 11:45:47PM 6 points [-]

One word: spambots.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 26 January 2012 09:58:21AM 5 points [-]

Maybe we could use the same mechanism to protect LW wiki from spambots. The wiki registration page would be available only to people with karma at least... well, 1 should be enough. Reaching karma 1 should be trivial for any LW member, and pretty difficult for a generic spambot.

Comment author: MixedNuts 26 January 2012 07:52:42PM 5 points [-]

Technical difficulties of merging the two currently independent login systems.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 28 January 2012 07:05:08PM 1 point [-]

I support this enough to make a comment in addition to upvoting. Whenever I check the wiki's recent changes page, way too many of the recent changes are spambots creating accounts or Vladimir_Nesov killing them. As MixedNuts points out, the code end is difficult, but the fix would be highly appreciated.