Morendil comments on Diseased disciplines: the strange case of the inverted chart - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Morendil 07 February 2012 09:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Morendil 06 February 2012 06:46:18PM 12 points [-]

What makes you think I haven't?

As far as "official" academic publishing is concerned, I've been in touch with the editors of IEEE Software's "Voice of Evidence" column for about a year now, though on an earlier topic - the so-called "10x programmers" studies. The response was positive - i.e. "yes, we're interested in publishing this". So far, however, we haven't managed to hash out a publication schedule.

You've said so yourself, I'm making these observations publicly - though on a self-published basis as far as the book is concerned. I'm not sure what more would be accomplished by submitting a publication - but I'm certainly not opposed to that.

It's a lot more difficult, as has been noted previously on Less Wrong, to publish "negative" results in academic fora than to publish "positive" ones - one of the failures of science-in-general, not unique to software engineering.

Comment author: thakil 06 February 2012 06:52:23PM 4 points [-]

Then any objection withdrawn!

Comment author: asr 08 February 2012 04:47:13AM 0 points [-]

I commend you for pushing this, and Software is a decently high-impact venue.