= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
lavalamp comments on Acausal romance - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (35)
A "girlfriend" having the ability to specify the author's world with "microphysical detail" clearly has a great amount of computational power available to her, and the author ought to expect some minuscule amount of his measure to awaken in said girlfriend's universe, having just been fabricated via their equivalent of nanotechnology...
If you have some meaningful way to assign measure to these things then the whole idea falls apart. However that's quite philosophically tricky AFAICT.
Sure, but why ruin a perfectly good theory by estimating how much you should anticipate it? :)
The MST3K mantra applies to philosophy to a far greater extent than it applies to works of fiction.
MST3K mantra = "I should relax, it's just a show"?
Tone doesn't translate in comments very well, my comment was intended to be humorous...