Gust comments on Heuristics and Biases in Charity - Less Wrong

21 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 02 March 2012 03:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gust 02 March 2012 06:31:52PM 2 points [-]

I do think your hypothesis is plausible, but the reasoning it describes seems too complex. One would think like that only if one cares about being consistent and reflects on that, and only after one has decided that the "I've done my part of the job" excuse is not enough... and it seems improbable that most people think like that.

Also, it seems to me that "help Haiti just this once" is not the same scenario as "help just this person".

Worth testing, though. I guess if you set up a scenario like "Help poor kid X grow up well", a long term goal with kinda-hard-to-predict cost that most people wouldn't be willing to pay all at once, with a specific identifiable subject...

Comment author: [deleted] 02 March 2012 09:40:55PM 1 point [-]

I do think your hypothesis is plausible, but the reasoning it describes seems too complex. One would think like that only if one cares about being consistent and reflects on that, and only after one has decided that the "I've done my part of the job" excuse is not enough... and it seems improbable that most people think like that.

The enormous line of research on cognitive dissonance--see the forced compliance paradigm in particular--indicates the importance of consistency, even when it isn't consciously recognized as such.

Comment author: Gust 03 March 2012 12:10:05AM 0 points [-]

Thank you for the link. That really makes Yvain's hypothesis more probable.