APMason comments on Rationality Quotes April 2012 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Oscar_Cunningham 03 April 2012 12:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (858)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: APMason 04 April 2012 11:52:35AM 1 point [-]

1-2-3-4-5-6 is a Schelling point for overt tampering with a lottery.

I don't think that's true. If you were going to tamper with the lottery, isn't your most likely motive that you want to win it? Why, then, set it up in such a way that you have to share the prize with the thousands of other people who play those numbers?

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 04 April 2012 12:00:42PM 1 point [-]

I specified "overt tampering" rather than "covert tampering". If you wanted to choose a result that would draw suspicion, 1-2-3-4-5-6 strikes me as the most obvious candidate.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 April 2012 12:51:34PM 1 point [-]

If you wanted to choose a result that would draw suspicion

Why would anyone want to do that? (I'm sure that any reason for that would be much more likely than 1 in 175 million, but still I can't think of it.)

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 04 April 2012 01:00:44PM *  5 points [-]

The three most obvious answers (to my mind) are:

1) to demonstrate your Big Angelic Powers
2) to discredit the lottery organisers
3) as a prank / because you can