= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Stefan_King comments on Just for fun - let's play a game. - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (68)
deleted
del
Maybe we should modify the game so that the lie has to be the approximate opposite of something that's true? (Actual opposite when used in a logic class.)
del
My rule is a restriction to prevent an underwhelming reveal, not a heuristic for choosing good lies.
If you're interested in the subject of choosing good lies: All of your statements (whether they are truth or false) should be statements that are unlikely to describe a randomly chosen person. That's why the witchcraft one would not make a good truth or lie.
My probabilities are: .1, .3, .2, .2, .2
In case people don't know that, hotornot scores are so heavily biased, so getting 9.6 is quite simple