= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
David_Gerard comments on Holden Karnofsky's Singularity Institute Objection 2 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (41)
AI researchers in general appear to think this of SIAI, per the Muelhauser-Wang dialogue - they just don't consider its concerns are worth taking seriously. That dialogue read to me like "I'm trying to be polite here, but you guys are crackpots." This was a little disconcerting to see.
In other words, Wang has made a System-1 evaluation of SI, on a topic where System-1 doesn't work very well.
Downsides of technology deserve taking seriously - and are taken seriously by many researchers - e.g. here.
Remember: "With great power comes great responsibility".