Gabriel comments on Final Words - Less Wrong

71 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 27 April 2009 09:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gabriel 30 January 2011 11:44:16PM 2 points [-]

I voted this down, and the immediate parent up.

And then I became enlightened.

Comment author: gwern 31 January 2011 12:39:22AM 1 point [-]

I rolled a 1d3 dice using the lambdabot in #haskell to determine what I would do, assigning 1 to vote parent and its parent up, 2 to do nothing, and 3 to downvote parent and its parent. I got a 2.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 31 January 2011 02:30:27AM 1 point [-]

I rolled 1d12 with an actual d12 (Hey, you kids! Get offa my lawn!). 1-4 to upvote gwern, 5-8 to do nothing, and 9-12 to downvote. I got a 10. Then I upvoted all the comments between gwern and Eliezer, inclusive, as a celebration of starting this thread up again. (I also found another comment of gjm's and voted it up, because the Bertha Jorkins and Charlie Gordon references are brilliant.

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 31 January 2011 08:20:07AM *  2 points [-]

Hopefully a*|I voted this down and immediate parent down>*|other-stuff-1> + b*|I voted this up and immediate parent down>*|other-stuff-2> + c*|I voted this down and immediate parent up>*|other-stuff-3> + d*|I voted this up and immediate parent up>*|other-stuff-4> + e*|other possible outcomes>

with a, b, c, d having hopefully approximately the same modulus and e having small modulus, by requesting from hotbits (which claims to use a quantum source of uncertainty) one byte, taking the two lowest order bits, with the 1 bit being for the immediate comment I'm replying to and the 2 bit being for its immediate parent, going by the rule of 0 = downvote and 1 = upvote. (Well, okay, really a mixed state given how it'll all work, but there will be in the mixed state a sum of states of the form described above, so...)

Requesting byte... now:

And this blob of quantum amplitude is a blob that received FC. So let's see, that means... both low order bits zero. So downvotes for both Normal_anomaly and gwern. Awww. Well, at least there'll hopefully be other branches of equal weight in which you both got upvotes from this procedure.

(Hotbits apparently stores up random bits and generally serves requests by peeling off the stack of stored random bits the number of bytes requested. So if the pre stored stuff entangled itself with the rest of the world sufficiently that my decision to do this ended up nontrivially entangled with the particular byte I got, then no promises about other branches. But again, probably end up with basically just a whole lot of states similar to the desired one except that the "other stuff" parts are a tad different.)

Comment author: Quirinus_Quirrell 01 February 2011 02:16:02AM 4 points [-]

I voted on this and the immediate parent, but I won't reveal why, or which direction, or how many times, or which account I used.

Comment author: orthonormal 13 February 2011 10:28:16PM 1 point [-]

Don't blame me, I voted for the original comment.

Comment author: Celer 12 May 2011 10:27:41PM 0 points [-]

Blame me, because I restarted the chain. I voted this down, because it was not very amusing, and the parent up, because I assume it was an HPMOR reference and that is awesome.

Comment author: thomblake 12 May 2011 11:14:40PM *  0 points [-]

Voted up all comments in this chain except this one, because I can't vote on my own comments anymore.

Comment author: ygert 15 January 2013 07:45:31PM 1 point [-]

I just want to say that I find this chain ridiculously funny beyond all expected measure. None of it (past a point) has any reason to exist, but it still went on quite a while. Good job everyone on writing something so amazingly ridiculous :-)

Comment author: alicey 16 March 2015 06:44:20PM 1 point [-]

Voted down all comments in this chain except this one, because I am flesh.