ciphergoth comments on This Didn't Have To Happen - Less Wrong

22 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 23 April 2009 07:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (183)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ciphergoth 24 April 2009 07:30:44AM 4 points [-]
Comment author: knb 24 April 2009 03:23:50PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, I heard about this on Bullshit with Penn & Teller. I considered choosing someone else, but Mother Teresa is still the easiest symbol of pure altruism. (That same episode included a smackdown on the Dalai Lama and Ghandi, so my options look pretty weak.

Comment author: Annoyance 24 April 2009 04:06:47PM 0 points [-]

Perhaps you should reconsider the value of 'pure altruism'.

Comment author: thomblake 24 April 2009 05:36:15PM 1 point [-]

Yes, 'pure altruism' is a pretty weak position, and you won't find many proponents of it. Altruism as an ethical position doesn't make any sense; you keep pushing all of your utils on other people, but if you consider a 2-person system doing this, nobody actually gets to keep any of the utils.

Comment author: steven0461 24 April 2009 07:00:39PM 2 points [-]

Agreed, but under certain conditions relating to how much causal influence one has on others vs. oneself, utilitarianism and pure altruism lead to the same prescriptions. (I would argue these conditions are usually satisfied in practice.)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 April 2009 06:59:10PM 0 points [-]

Gandhi? Really? My impression is that the "smackdown" on Gandhi is vastly, vastly less forceful than the smackdown on Teresa. Though I haven't watched that particular episode, I've read other critiques that seemed to be reaching as far as possible, and they didn't reach very far.

Comment author: Swimmy 25 April 2009 08:26:00AM 0 points [-]

It mostly had to do with Gandhi being racist.