Thank you - but that's the wrong question to ask first! The first question is "why on Earth would you think that? What brings this hypothesis to your attention?"
Ah, I disagree - that's only the first question to ask if the person is used to having ideas. My human-simulator tells me that posts like this come from people who aren't used to having ideas - certainly not enough to throw them away - so are enormously taken with any they do come up with (c.f. Draco in HPMOR ch. 78 ) and are not used to the idea of robustness-testing of their ideas at all - they're still in the mode of thinking of them as aesthetic creations, and will not let go of them easily. Once they've got used to coming up with a few, they will then...
What do you think? There might be a theoritical limitation to how much data an AI could collect without influencing the data itself and making its prediction redundant. Would this negate the idea of a 'God' AIand cause it to make suboptimal choices even with near limitless processing power?