GLaDOS comments on [Link] Why the kids don’t know no algebra - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (165)
Weren't learning styles type ideas mostly debunked or rather turned out to be something for which very little evidence existed?
I would very much like citation since your most recent evidence conflicts with most of the other evidence I am aware of! From what I know early childhood interventions produce effects but these are temporary gains that mostly wear off over time, having very little to no effect on adult performance.
Having done some research, I find that you are correct, at least as regards to parenting and genetics. My 'cached' opinion was based on misleading information absorbed for what I though was good reason, but, on reflection, was just blindly following authority. Retracted.
Citing any key material you looked up might be useful for other people. Awesome job on actually checking out the literature yourself a bit and updating!
Rationalist hugs for you (if you want them)!
(^_^)
You're adorable.
I'm not sure how to take that.
As encouragement :)
I don't know. But the converse is that there's one style that's optimal for nearly everybody. Yet many different styles are used in practice around the world. Which style is supposed to be best?
ETA: retracted, my bad. I thought you were talking about "teaching styles" not "learning styles".
Actually, teaching styles is more what I meant. Perhaps a better phrasing would have been different people respond to learning differently, though that still doesn't sound right. For this, I have only anecdotal evidence, albeit quite strong. I've seen it, both in people I've tried to teach things to, and in people I've learned alongside.
I find the reactions to this topic in this thread very interesting, given that the (currently) second-most-upvoted article on the site contains this passage: