= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Grognor comments on Reply to Holden on The Singularity Institute - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (213)
That's an unfortunate response, given that I offered a detailed DH6-level disagreement (quote the original article directly, and refute the central points), and also offered important novel argumentation not previously published by SI. I'm not sure what else people could have wanted.
If somebody figures out why Kaj and some others had the reaction they did, I'm all ears.
One sad answer is that your post is boring, which is another way of saying it doesn't have enough Dark Arts to be sufficiently persuasive.
-Sister Y