Jonathan_Graehl comments on Reply to Holden on The Singularity Institute - Less Wrong

46 Post author: lukeprog 10 July 2012 11:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (213)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 12 July 2012 11:49:51PM 1 point [-]

100 years ago it would seem to have been too early to fund work on AI risk mitigation

Hilarious, and an unfairly effective argument. I'd like to know such people, who can entertain an idea that will still be tantalizing yet unresolved a century out.

that seems like an overly narrow choice reliant on presumption that it is not an alternative to not work on AI risk mitigation now.

Yes. I agree with everything else, too, with the caveat that SI is not the first organization to draw attention to AI risk) - not that you said so.