aelephant comments on Group rationality diary, 7/23/12 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (48)
After reading this review about the health effects of Dark chocolate, I've added it to my regular menu.
I have a theory that nobody considers both "white chocolate" and "dark chocolate" to be "chocolate", and for me, alas, that parameter is set to "white chocolate".
2 out of 5 Quibbloniacs accuse you of Taste Projection Fallacy, and 1 out of 10 Squiddoolies find you guilty.
Your cruel and unusual punishment... The Squiddoolies also say White Chocolate is not really 'chocolate' at all because it doesn't contain any cocoa solids.
I consider both to be chocolate. One of them is mostly candy-chocolate and one of them is mostly ingredient-chocolate.
Indeed. Healthy and delicious is a powerful combination.
If you start cooking with dark chocolate rather than just eating it (though it's delicious either way), there's a lot of non-obvious things to watch out for. I'm not sure of your cooking baseline skill, but I could share some tips for making very nice dark chocolate covered strawberries at a very low effort level if you'd like.
For semisweet, the steps are a) melt chocolate in a dish b) dip strawberries c) chill them on a plate on wax paper in the fridge. Is it less obvious for ultra-dark chocolate?
I find it more difficult to temper and finicky with blooming (discoloration). Eg, recipes that use the fridge recommend timings for dark chocolate of 1-2 mins in the fridge vs 4-5 minutes for milk. So instead I use safer techniques like non-fridge tempering vs fridge tempering, and hot water baths instead of a double boiler.
As you note, it's not particularly difficult to get chocolate around a strawberry. The hard part is making it the right color and texture and ensuring that it stays good without going bad early.