faul_sname comments on Rationality Quotes August 2012 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Alejandro1 03 August 2012 03:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (426)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: faul_sname 03 August 2012 05:48:34PM *  5 points [-]

It's absurd to divide people into two categories and expect those two categories to be meaningful in more than a few contexts.

Comment author: Stabilizer 03 August 2012 09:05:32PM 20 points [-]

It is absurd to divide people. They tend to die if you do that.

Comment author: Kindly 04 August 2012 12:19:55AM 8 points [-]

It's absurd to divide. You tend to die if you do that.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 04 August 2012 04:45:07PM 12 points [-]

It's absurd: You tend to die.

Comment author: faul_sname 04 August 2012 07:55:29PM 7 points [-]

It's absurd to die.

Comment author: albeola 04 August 2012 08:43:51PM 5 points [-]

It's bs to die.

Comment author: Epiphany 18 August 2012 05:11:50AM *  4 points [-]

Be.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 August 2012 09:24:39AM 1 point [-]

“To do is to be” -- Nietzsche

“To be is to do” -- Kant

“Do be do be do” -- Sinatra

Comment author: Decius 04 August 2012 09:50:42PM 1 point [-]

Nobody alive has died yet.

Comment author: mfb 04 August 2012 10:11:46PM -2 points [-]

At least not in worlds where he is alive.

Comment author: Decius 05 August 2012 12:48:16AM 0 points [-]

Is it worse to enter a state of superimposed death and life than to die?

Comment author: wedrifid 06 August 2012 06:11:28PM *  2 points [-]

Is it worse to enter a state of superimposed death and life than to die?

I hope not. That's the state we are all in now and what we are entering constantly. Unless there are rounding errors in the universe we haven't detected yet.

Comment author: mfb 06 August 2012 11:25:04AM 1 point [-]

I think life requires a system large and complex enough to produce decoherence between "alive" and "dead" in timescales shorter than required to define "alive" at all.

Comment author: dspeyer 05 August 2012 10:59:21PM -2 points [-]

It will be quick. It might even be painless. I would not know. I have never died.

-- Voldemort

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 12:43:19AM 8 points [-]

“Males” and “females”. (OK, there are edge cases and stuff, but this doesn't mean the categories aren't meaningful, does it?)

Comment author: Clippy 03 August 2012 08:38:37PM 1 point [-]

What about good vs bad humans?

Comment author: faul_sname 04 August 2012 07:52:48PM 1 point [-]

Or humans who create paperclips versus those who don't?

Comment author: Clippy 05 August 2012 12:28:55AM 10 points [-]

I thought I just said that.

Comment author: MatthewBaker 11 August 2012 12:31:44AM 0 points [-]

Can't their be good humans who don't create paperclips and just destroy antipaperclips and staples and such?

Comment author: Clippy 14 August 2012 12:20:47AM 1 point [-]

Destroying antipaperclips is creating paperclips.

I didn't know humans had the concept though.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 August 2012 09:26:02AM 1 point [-]

What is an antipaperclip?

Comment author: Clippy 21 August 2012 11:50:16PM 3 points [-]

Anything not a paperclip, or in opposition to further paperclipping. You might ask, "Why not just say 'non-paperclips'?" but anti-paperclips include paperclips deliberately designed to unbend, or which work at anti-paperclip purposes (say, a paperclip being used to short-circuit the electrical systems in a paperclip factory).