= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Armok_GoB comments on Call For Agreement: Should LessWrong have better protection against cultural collapse? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (90)
As a last-resort emergency measure, we might also want to literally shut down the site automatically if to many people try to join in a given day until we've found better ways to handle this.
We could just shut down new account creation rather than the whole site.
That's what I sa-
Huh, guess it wasn't what I said.
This has been done by many sites, and appears to be a useful tactic.
I agree: anyone wishing to shut down this internet website should be required to register numerous accounts within a one-day span, and all requests meeting such criteria should be automatically anonymised and approved.
That's a really good point I didn't think of. Hopeful something like not allowing more than one register per IP adress per day would fix it...
I like your idea of adding a requirement that they spoof IPs.
Hey! It's a trivial inconvenience! But yea, it's not really enough.