DanielLC comments on From First Principles - Less Wrong

48 [deleted] 27 September 2012 07:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 29 September 2012 01:45:51AM 0 points [-]

Well you can at least give the liklihood ratio of a positive test,

How? You need to know how likely it is to be positive given that you have cancer. If it's a perfect test, the likelihood ratio is infinity to one. If it's a random test, it's one to one. Since it could be either of those, or anything in between, you can't figure that out.

Am I misinterpreting what you mean by positive rate, likelihood ratio, or both?

Comment author: [deleted] 29 September 2012 02:37:09AM *  0 points [-]

prior odds are 1:99 against, posterior odds are 1:9.9, therefore LR of positive is 10. I may have miscommunicated. I meant posterior when I said "positive rate" ("cancer rate given positive" was my interpretation) I can see how it is better parsed as "rate that you test positive", which is something else. Sorry for the confusion.