GabrielDuquette comments on Why is Mencius Moldbug so popular on Less Wrong? [Answer: He's not.] - Less Wrong

9 Post author: arborealhominid 16 November 2012 06:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (259)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 November 2012 08:38:53AM 2 points [-]

The whole thing seems to hinge on the arbitrariness of professors' intellectual leanings. How do we know they are so arbitrary? If you polled all the economics professors of major universities in the US, would their outlook confirm MM's argument? Or is his data obsolete, based on a stereotype?

Perhaps some journalists get some wrong ideas from some professors. I don't know why I should believe that it's an irretrievably bad situation, however.

Central planning as done in democracy is imprecise because academia introduces systematic biases into central planning. A non-democratic ruler could avoid this bias.

This sounds to me like burning down the house to get rid of termites.

Comment author: Juno_Watt 28 May 2013 01:44:56PM 2 points [-]

The whole thing seems to hinge on the arbitrariness of professors' intellectual leanings. How do we know they are so arbitrary? If you polled all the economics professors of major universities in the US, would their outlook confirm MM's argument? Or is his data obsolete, based on a stereotype?

I don't model academia as having a single bias. In my experience, it is a bunch of subcultures -- for instance, economics professors tend to love libertarianism, and sociology professors tend to hate it. I have been "informed" from time to time that my university education was nothing but left-wing propaganda, although I don't recall much mention of politics on my physics course.

Another thing that is peculiar about this argument is the relative lack of emphasis on the influence of familt, church, etc on people's thinking. If the tertiary education sector is so influential on the US, why aren't most US citizens believers in evolution?

Comment author: JoshuaZ 28 May 2013 02:37:04PM 2 points [-]

If the tertiary education sector is so influential on the US, why aren't most US citizens believers in evolution?

By some metrics a slight majority of people in the US accept evolution, but your basic point is sound.