= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
somervta comments on Assessing Kurzweil: the results - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (59)
Would it be possible for you to send me the original data with the comments/justifications attached/ I'm interested in doing a side-by-side comparison with Kurzweil's own analysis of his predictions.
Most of the assessments didn't have comments or justifications (maybe about 1/4 did). I think the assessors would feel uncomfortable having those published (some are in very informal style). And, as I said, it wouldn't be a fair or systematic assessment - the comments weren't intended for that purpose.
I am only one of the contributors, but you're welcome to view my comments. I doubt it will be helpful for your purpose, though.
I'll see what I can do with them. It may be useful, even if I can only do a partial comparison.