Eugine_Nier comments on Notes on Autonomous Cars - Less Wrong

21 Post author: gwern 24 January 2013 03:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (139)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 26 January 2013 02:59:53AM 2 points [-]

"I personally object to X, therefore X should be forbidden for everyone."

You seem to be confusing "I don't like X" with "I object to X". The following two examples should help illustrate proper usage:

I don't like chocolate.

I object to baby eating.

Comment author: Kindly 26 January 2013 03:04:33AM 3 points [-]

Just because you, personally, object to eating babies, doesn't mean you have any right to say whether eating babies should be forbidden to others!

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 27 January 2013 12:37:17AM 1 point [-]

Very well, I have a preference too, I prefer that people who kill small children receive the death penalty. Put the electric chair next to the kitchen, you follow your preference, and I'll follow mine.

(With apologies to Charles James Napier.)

Comment author: Kawoomba 26 January 2013 06:57:24AM 0 points [-]

I don't like chocolate - I object to chocolate - Chocolate should be illegal!

I'm not confusing those, I claim those are all too easily confused in the general population.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 27 January 2013 12:27:36AM *  4 points [-]

I'm not confusing those,

Looking at all your comments in this thread, it seems to me that you are. At the very least you don't seem to have exerted any effort thinking about how to tell whether something is like chocolate or like baby-eating.