NancyLebovitz comments on Open Thread, March 1-15, 2013 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 01 March 2013 12:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (237)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 02 March 2013 03:43:02AM *  3 points [-]

I've been trying out the brain-training software from Posit science. I've definitely gotten better at some of their training material (tracking objects in a crowd of identical objects and seeing briefly shown motion), but I'm not sure whether it's improving my life.

Have any of you tried Posit's BrainHQ? If so, how has it worked out for you?

The training exercises look like they're only available as expensive software, but if you do their free exercises, they'll offer a $10/month option.

I found out about Posit from this video-- Merzenich clearly has something to sell, but nothing he said seemed like obvious nonsense.

Comment author: gwern 02 March 2013 05:41:19AM 5 points [-]

Brain training doesn't usually transfer. The Posit studies haven't been much better than any others.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 02 March 2013 07:44:00AM 2 points [-]

Even working memory training?

Comment author: gwern 02 March 2013 03:49:13PM 1 point [-]

Looks like it.

Comment author: Elithrion 02 March 2013 04:54:49AM *  0 points [-]

Okay, I played most of the free exercises, and apparently I'm like the ultimate boss at spotting different birds (aka "Brain speed - Hawk eye"), never making a single mistake at even the highest available speed, and merely mediocre/slightly above average at other things. I also noticed while playing the object tracking one that what allowed me to do better is I came up with new "algorithms" for tracking things. First time I did it, I tracked up to three objects easily, but then failed miserably at more. After practice, I learned to imagine lines between the objects, which let me track four correctly most of the time, and five occasionally. Which, setting aside me not be that good at this one, seems like a case of other-optimising. I really doubt learning to imagine lines between objects generalises well.

So, from personal experience, I'm sceptical it's useful, but at the same time, listening to the video in the background (which may have reduced my performance on some of these), it does sound like there's some research to support this.