ModusPonies comments on Open Thread, March 1-15, 2013 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 01 March 2013 12:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (237)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ModusPonies 03 March 2013 08:20:49AM *  3 points [-]

Has anyone here ever decided not to read something because it had a trigger warning? I can't imagine doing so myself, but that may be the typical mind fallacy.

EDIT: People do use the warnings. Good to know.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 03 March 2013 08:38:18PM 6 points [-]

Has anyone here ever decided not to read something because it had a trigger warning? I can't imagine doing so myself, but that may be the typical mind fallacy.

I have chosen not to consume media (including but not limited to text) because of an explicit trigger warning. Not often, though; most trigger warnings relate to topics I don't have trauma about.

More often, I have chosen to defer consuming media because of an explicit trigger warning, to a time and place when/where emotional reactions are more appropriate.

I have consumed media in the absence of such warnings that, had such a warning been present, I would have likely chosen to defer. In some cases this has had consequences I would have preferred to avoid.

Comment author: tut 03 March 2013 09:03:25AM *  5 points [-]

I haven't, but I think that were trigger warnings are appropriate is in things that hurt a few people disproportionately. If something hurts everyone that reads it you shouldn't write it at all, and if it hurts no one more than it is worth it isn't a case for trigger warnings. But if it is something that needs to be said to many people, and there is a significant group (perhaps those that have had a certain experience) who would suffer a lot from reading it, then you put a trigger warning that would be recognized by that group at the top.

TLDR If most people never care about trigger warnings, then they might work as intended.

Comment author: erratio 03 March 2013 06:03:03PM *  2 points [-]

I have chosen not to Google something that I was warned would involve seeing particularly horrific images. I imagine that if said topic was put in blog post form with a trigger warning up the top, I would probably choose not to read it.

EDIT: It's probably worth adding that I adopted this policy after discovering the hard way that there are things out there I would really prefer not to see/hear about.

Comment author: torekp 03 March 2013 04:18:19PM 2 points [-]

I've decided not to listen to some radio segments because of such warnings. Similar principle.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 03 March 2013 06:21:42PM 1 point [-]

Have you had an experience that might cause you to be triggered by the kind of thing that gets trigger warnings?

Comment author: [deleted] 04 March 2013 01:03:56PM 0 points [-]

I haven't, but I have never experienced a serious trauma that I don't want to be reminded to me, so I'm not the kind of person that people who write trigger warnings are thinking about.

Comment author: Decius 03 March 2013 09:32:27PM *  0 points [-]

I know a person who chose not to read something (MAX Punisher #1) based on my warning of explicit sexual violence.

Anecdotal and incomplete, but most of an example case...