Sarokrae comments on Existential risks open thread - Less Wrong

10 Post author: John_Maxwell_IV 31 March 2013 12:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sarokrae 06 April 2013 12:46:13PM *  0 points [-]

Pushing for more democratic governments in states like Russia and China might also decrease the chances of nuclear war, etc.

How sure are you?

  • Acts of military aggression by the PRC since 1949: About 5.
  • Acts of military aggression by the USSR/Russia in the same period: About 5
  • Acts of military aggression by the USA in the same period: About 7

(I've tried to be upwardly biased on numbers for all three, since it's obviously hard to decide who the aggressors in a conflict are)

  • Wars that the PRC have participated in that were not part of domestic territorial disputes since 1949: 2
  • Likewise for Russia: 5
  • Likewise for the USA: 17

(for the USA and USSR figures I'm counting all of the Cold War as one conflict, and likewise all of the War on Terror)

Sources found here

Edit: What happened to my formatting? I've had this problem before but I've never been able to fix it.

Comment author: SWIM 07 April 2013 12:47:18AM *  1 point [-]

Good point. I think ideally your sample size would be larger, I'm not sure the US is representative of democratic countries.

Re: formatting. Try putting a blank line between bullets.

Comment author: Sarokrae 07 April 2013 06:26:51PM 0 points [-]

Re: formatting. Try putting a blank line between bullets.

Tried, doesn't work. Anyone got any ideas?

Comment author: SWIM 10 April 2013 07:32:35AM *  1 point [-]

You also need to put a space between the asterisk and the start of your sentence. Ex.:

* These

* Will

* Be

* Bullet

* Points


  • These

  • Will

  • Be

  • Bullet

  • Points

Comment author: Sarokrae 12 April 2013 10:49:10AM 1 point [-]

Thank you!