MugaSofer comments on Welcome to Less Wrong! (5th thread, March 2013) - Less Wrong

27 Post author: orthonormal 01 April 2013 04:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1750)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MugaSofer 25 April 2013 12:21:02PM -2 points [-]

I think the Academy puts for too much faith in their technological marvel of 'Reason.'

I don't think I'm parsing this correctly. Could you expand on it a bit?

I would say at the outset that I think 'the hard problem of ethics' remains unsolved. Until it is solved, the prospects for any benign or friendly AI seem remote.

Well, you'll find plenty of agreement here, for certain definitions of "unsolved".

Comment author: seanwelsh77 30 April 2013 09:21:01PM 0 points [-]

I don't think I'm parsing this correctly. Could you expand on it a bit?

You need the Sith parser :-)

I guess the point I am making is that Reason alone is not enough and a lot of what we call Reason is technology derived from the effect on brains on being able to write. There is some interesting research on how cognition and reasoning differs between literate and preliterate people. I think Emotion plays a critical role in decision making. I am not going out to bat for Faith except in the Taras Bulba sense: "I put my faith in my sword and my sword in the Pole!" (The Polish were the enemy of the Cossack Taras Bulba in the ancient Yul Brynner flick I am quoting from.)

Comment author: MugaSofer 01 May 2013 02:06:54PM -1 points [-]

Whee, references!

We create technologies to help us do stuff better - Taras' sword being only one example. Why not a technology to help us think better? Heck, there are plenty of "mental technologies" besides Rationality - a great example would be the Memory Palace visualization technique (it's featured in an episode of Sherlock, for bonus reference points, but it's not portrayed very well; Google it instead.)