army1987 comments on Open Thread, May 1-14, 2013 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: whpearson 01 May 2013 10:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (648)
Tags: open_thread

Comments (648)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 May 2013 04:01:57PM 3 points [-]

Suppose I have several different points to make in response to a given comment. Do I write all of them in a single comment, or do I write each of them in a separate comment? There doesn't seem to be an universally accepted norm about this -- the former seems to be more common, but there's at least one regular here who customarily does the latter and I can't remember anyone complaining about that.

Advantages of writing separate comments:

  • I can retract each of them individually, in case I change my mind about one of them but still stand by the others (as here).
  • Each of them can be upvoted or downvoted separately, so I don't have to guess what people are enjoying or objecting to.
  • If each comment gives rise to a discussion, and someone is only interested in one of them, they can collapse the other ones.

Disadvantages of writing separate comments:

  • It clutters the Recent Comments sidebar and page, my contribution history, and the mailbox of the author of the parent comment.
  • It increases the total number of comments in the thread, making it more likely for it to exceed the maximum number a reader has set and for other comments to get hidden.
  • It may come across as something unusual done in the attempt of getting more total karma that I could otherwise have.

Should we standardize on one possibility, or decide on a case-by-case basis?

Comment author: drethelin 08 May 2013 05:56:35PM 0 points [-]

case by case seems fine.

Comment author: TimS 08 May 2013 04:33:08PM 1 point [-]

Should we standardize on one possibility, or decide on a case-by-case basis?

As a more serious response, I personally try to make one response, unless the commenter is still actively part of the discussion and the discussion has clearly split into two topics. In practice, that tends to weigh very strongly against splitting.

One major disadvantage of splitting an active conversation is that interesting points may go into only one branch, and end up missed in the other branch. Especially if one's main method of browsing is clicking the recent comments.

Comment author: TimS 08 May 2013 04:29:39PM -1 points [-]

I'm just enjoying that this post is upvoted for asking a question, by the upvoter did not make any suggestion for the answer. My sense of humor is apparently quite degenerate.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 May 2013 04:34:17PM 2 points [-]

Maybe the upvoter wants my comment to be more visible because they are also interested in other people's opinion on this, but didn't have anything to add to what I said themselves.

Comment author: TimS 08 May 2013 04:37:25PM 0 points [-]

I think you took my comment more seriously than I intended. Anyway, I don't sort by karma because I find it confusing to follow conversations when comments aren't listed in the order made. But I'm not trained by Reddit (or where-ever the sort-by-karma norms are coming from).

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit