CarlShulman comments on A Proposed Adjustment to the Astronomical Waste Argument - Less Wrong

19 Post author: Nick_Beckstead 27 May 2013 03:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 28 May 2013 05:07:28PM *  4 points [-]

Conceivably, the genetic code,

Interestingly, aside from not being present in our inorganic machines, synthetic biologists including George Church are already at work on bioengineered organisms with new genetic codes because of advantages like disease resistance.

Also, it's important to note that when Robin talks about things lasting "a long time" he usually doesn't mean in the sense of astronomical waste and the true long-run, but in economic doublings, i.e. he considers something that lasts for 2 years after whole brain emulations get going to be long-lasting, even if it is a miniscule portion of future history.