tut comments on One Life Against the World - Less Wrong

32 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 18 May 2007 10:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MatthewB 27 December 2009 11:32:14AM 3 points [-]

What I am going to say may be extremely unpopular,but everything you have stated about bringing a child to terms could well fall within the terminology used by Psychohistorian:

once she's pregnant, she doesn't actively have to do much but not starve.

Even given all of the discomforts and difficulties you have mentioned, they are more about the Mother than the child, and as long as the puking, cramping, cranky, hormonal mother does not starve, the child should be delivered.

I think that most of what you have mentioned are just difficulties with the attempt to make certain the mother does not starve.

But, then, at this point, it's really all just semantics / terminology that we are talking about

Comment author: tut 27 December 2009 11:59:49AM *  2 points [-]

as long as the ... mother does not starve, the child should be delivered.

Good medicine does a bit more than that. If the only thing you do is "not starve" the probability is somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3 that the child will die. Quite possibly killing the mother as well.

ETA: Not doing things can also be hard, if the consequences are unpleasant enough