Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on One Life Against the World - Less Wrong

32 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 18 May 2007 10:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 May 2007 12:20:18AM 10 points [-]

In a Big World, which this one appears to be on at least three counts (spatially infinite open universe, inflationary scenario in Standard Model, and Everett branches), everyone who could exist already exists with probability 1. Thus, the issue is not so much creating new people, but ensuring that good things happen to people given that they exist. Creating a new person helps when you can provide them with good outcomes, because what you're really doing is increasing the frequency of good outcomes from that starting point.

Or at least that's one anthropic interpretation of ethics. But it is one reason why I don't endorse running out and creating lots of people if that lowers the average standard of living. In a Big World, it's the average standard of living that you care about.

Comment author: Capla 20 October 2014 03:51:34AM 1 point [-]

Tell me if I'm wrong, but doesn't a many worlds reality mean that all possible states of those people also occur with a probability of one? How can you possibly "[increase] the frequency of good outcomes"? All the outcomes occur in some world, irrespective of our actions.